Press Release/MediaDonations/More BillboardsAbout Us/Contact InfoDo you think you're a good person? Do you know Him?

> Home

> Origin of the Universe (Cosmology)
Science or Pseudo-Science?

> Origin of Life (Abiogenesis)
Science or Pseudo-Science?

> Common Descent (Darwinism)
Science or Pseudo-Science?

> How Does Evolution
Supposedly Work?

> Mutations

> Genetics

> Genetic Recombination

> Gene Duplication

> Natural Selection

> Fossil Evidence

> Stasis

> “Junk” DNA – The Biggest Blunder of Evolutionary-Based Science

> Endogenous Retroviruses

 
 

“Nature is very good at building structures but instead of bricks and mortar it uses molecules like proteins and lipids for its building blocks. For instance, a seed can take molecules from the air, soil and water and rearrange them into a tree.”

University of Wisconsin, Madison, “Molecules in nature are programmed to arrange themselves in certain ways,” Materials Research Science and Engineering Center website.
http://mrsec.wisc.edu/Edetc/
nanoquest/self_assembly/
index.html

“But throughout 150
years of the science of bacteriology, there is no evidence that one species of bacteria has changed into another … Since there is no evidence for species changes between the simplest forms of unicellular life, it is not surprising that there is no evidence for evolution from prokaryotic to eukaryotic cells, let
alone throughout the whole array of higher multicellular organisms.”
—Alan H. Linton

University of Bristol bacteriologist, "Scant Search for the Maker" Times Higher Education Supplement, 2001. (In his Review of “The Triumph of Evolution and the Failure of Creationism” By Niles Eldredge.)
http://www.jodkowski.pl/
ke/ALinton.html

 
 

 

 

“For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen,
being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power
and Godhead, so that they are without excuse”

Romans 1:20

 
 

“In each of these pivotal nexuses in life's history, the principal "types" seem to appear rapidly and fully equipped with the signature features of the respective new level of biological organization. No intermediate "grades" or intermediate forms between different types are detectable.”
—Eugene V Koonin,

“The Biological Big Bang model for the major transitions in evolution,” National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, in Biology Direct 2007, 2:21.
http://www.biology-direct.com/content/2/1/21

Reviewer's report 1, W. Ford Doolittle, Dalhousie University
“Evolutionary scenarios are an artform. They usefully exercise the brain, causing us to look at old data in new ways and stimulating us to collect new data. They do not have to be true!”

Exchange between W. Ford Doolittle and author Eugene V Koonin in regard to Koonin’s hypothesis, “The ancient Virus World and evolution of cells”
http://www.biology-direct.com/content/1/1/29

"To take a line of fossils and claim that they represent a lineage
is not a scientific hypothesis that can be tested, but an assertion that
carries the same validity as a bedtime story - amusing, perhaps
even instructive, but not scientific."
—Henry Gee

Ardent Evolutionist, Dr. Henry Gee, Senior Editor, Biological Sciences for the journal Nature as written in his book,In Search of Deep Time: Beyond the Fossil Record to a New History of Life, New York, The Free Press, 1999, page 126-127.

"The 'modern evolutionary synthesis' convinced most biologists that natural selection was the only directive influence on adaptive evolution. Today, however, dissatisfaction with the synthesis is widespread, and creationists and antidarwinians are multiplying. The central problem with the synthesis is its failure to show (or to provide distinct signs) that natural selection of random mutations could account for observed levels of adaptation."
—Egbert G. Leigh, Jr.

Biologist at Smithsonian Institute, in The Modern Synthesis, Ronald Fisher and Creationism, in Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 14, No. 12, pp. 495-498, December 1999, p. 495.

"We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some
of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant
promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific
community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism … Moreover, that materialism
is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door."
—Richard Lewontin

Evolutionary geneticist, Alexander Agassiz Research Professor, Harvard University, “Billions and billions of Demons,” The New York Review, p. 31, January 9, 1997

 
 

Join Our Email List
Email:  

 

 
 

“There is something else
in the cell that's controlling all the motors. That
opens up a big area for research—find what's driving these motors
and maybe we can
control them all by controlling one thing."
Welte and his team are
now looking at where in
the cell this signal comes from and how it
influences the motors.”

“Biologist modifies theory of cells' engines,” December 11th, 2008, Source: University of Rochester, Physorg.com website.
http://www.physorg.com/
news148227145.html

 
 

 

 

“… for if this plan or this work is of men, it will come to nothing;
but if it is of God, you cannot overthrow it—lest you even be found to fight against God.”
Acts 5:38.39

© 2009, Who Is Your Creator, All Rights Reserved

website statistics